Skip to main content

 

 

ORGANISATIONS JOIN FORCES TO PRODUCE LOW SULPHUR FUEL GUIDANCE

Wednesday, August 21, 2019  (Comments: 1)

CIMAC says that it is one of a number of shipping, refining, fuel supply and standards organisations which have been working together to produce Joint Industry Guidance on the supply and use of 0.50% sulphur marine fuel.

The guidance publication, released on 20 August 2019, has been developed by experts from across shipping, refining, supply and testing of marine fuels.

The publication is designed to provide guidance for stakeholders across the marine fuels and shipping industries, from fuel blenders and suppliers to end users. It presents the specific safety and operational issues relating to the supply and use of max. 0.50%-sulphur fuels, an overview of fuel quality principles, and the controls that should be put in place to ensure that safety issues are identified, prevented and/or mitigated. It addresses issues such as fuel compatibility, fuel stability, and fuel handling and storage, and contains a comprehensive review of existing operational factors that can affect safety. It does not address issues related to compliance with Flag State, Port State or IMO rules or guidelines, or alternative means of compliance (e.g. Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems), and does not include a discussion of alternative fuels such as liquefied natural gas, hydrogen or methanol.

Key messages:

  • Ensure fuel quality by ensuring that blend components are suitable for bunker fuel production, with particular attention being given to ensure that the final product is stable.
  • Fuel suppliers and purchasers should provide adequate information to the ship concerning the fuel as supplied to enable ship crew to identify and manage potential safety and operational issues associated with certain fuel properties and characteristics.
  • Fuel characteristics are expected to vary considerably between bunkers. The ship’s crew will need to adopt a more proactive approach to fuel management. They will need to know the fuel characteristics as loaded and be able to respond to the requirements, especially in terms of on board temperature requirements and any commingling.
  • While compatibility between fuels from different supply sources can be a concern in today’s environment, assessing compatibility of 0.50%-sulphur fuels from different sources will be key. To the extent possible, fuel should be loaded into an empty tank. The available space for new bunkers to be loaded should be taken as the capacity of the empty tanks in order to avoid commingling on loading.
  • Ship operators and fuel suppliers should review operational practices to allow sufficient time to test for compatibility between existing and proposed bunker fuel delivery, especially if no “empty” dedicated storage tank is available on the ship.

The publication is free and available to download from the websites of the participating organisations. The publication will be supported by an e-learning course to be released in October 2019.

Reader Comments (1)

Most of the ships are designed with single fuel concept. With fuel of correct specification i.e 0.50%S will be mixing with fuel of higher sulphur content during the initial transition with resultant higher sulphur content , becoming non compliant with PSC inspection. Transition guidelines needs to address this issue especially dealing with PSC / regulatory requirements

By MD. SHAMSUL ALAM on Monday, August 26, 2019

Leave Your Comment

Please keep your comment on topic, any inappropriate comments may be removed.

Return to index

Web Analytics